How Emotional Trauma Can Impact the Physical Body – and How Cranial Osteopathy May Help

Emotional trauma is often spoken about in psychological terms, yet its effects are frequently experienced physically. Decades of clinical observation, alongside growing scientific understanding, show that unresolved stress or trauma can be held within the body—particularly within the nervous system, muscles, connective tissue, and breathing patterns.

When an individual experiences emotional shock, prolonged stress, or overwhelming life events, the body activates protective survival responses such as fight, flight, or freeze. If these responses are not fully processed, the body may remain in a state of guarded tension or heightened alert. Over time, this can manifest as physical symptoms including persistent headaches, jaw or neck tension, chronic back pain, digestive issues, fatigue, poor sleep, or a general sense of internal unrest.

Cranial osteopathy is a gentle, hands-on approach that works with the subtle rhythms of the nervous system and the relationship between the skull, spine, and sacrum. Rather than forcing structural change, cranial osteopathy supports the body’s own regulatory mechanisms. By creating a calm and supportive therapeutic environment, treatment can help reduce nervous system overactivation, ease physical holding patterns, and support the body’s capacity to return to balance.

Patients often report improved sleep, reduced pain, enhanced breathing, and a deep sense of relaxation following cranial osteopathic treatment. Occasionally, emotional responses may arise—not because emotions are being analysed, but because the body is releasing protective patterns that have been held for long periods.

It is essential to understand that while cranial osteopathy may help relieve the physical expressions of trauma, it does not address the psychological causes themselves. Emotional trauma often requires complementary therapeutic approaches such as psychology, counselling, trauma-informed therapy, or body–mind work. These modalities work directly with emotional processing, memory, meaning, and integration.

With over 50 years of clinical experience, Malcolm Gregory approaches osteopathic treatment with a broad, integrated understanding informed by transpersonal psychology. This perspective recognises the inseparable relationship between body, mind, and nervous system—while respecting the distinct roles of physical and psychological therapies.

Cranial osteopathy can be a valuable part of a wider healing pathway, supporting physical regulation while emotional and psychological healing is addressed through appropriate therapeutic care.

Why Am I So Sore After Sport—and Can Osteopathy Help?

Post-exercise soreness is common, but persistent or excessive soreness may indicate more than just a good workout. Muscle stiffness, joint aches, or restricted movement after sport often reflect how the body is adapting—or failing to adapt—to physical load.

During sport, muscles are repeatedly stressed, joints are compressed or twisted, and connective tissues absorb force. If recovery is insufficient, or if there are underlying movement imbalances, the body compensates. These compensations can overload certain muscles or joints, leading to soreness that lingers longer than expected.

Osteopathy helps by identifying how the body is distributing load. An osteopath will assess joint mobility, muscle balance, spinal movement, and breathing mechanics to understand why certain areas are taking more strain than others. Treatment can improve circulation, reduce tissue tension, and restore joint movement—supporting more efficient recovery.

For athletes and active individuals, osteopathy is not just about pain relief. It can help optimise movement patterns, reduce injury risk, and support long-term performance by ensuring the body functions as a coordinated whole.

If soreness consistently limits your ability to train or recover, it may be your body asking for support—not rest alone, but better balance.

Does Stress Create Headaches?

Stress is one of the most common—and most underestimated—contributors to headaches. While headaches are often attributed to dehydration, eye strain, or poor posture, emotional and psychological stress can have a direct physical impact on the body.

When the nervous system is under prolonged stress, muscles tend to tighten, particularly around the neck, shoulders, jaw, and upper back. This sustained tension can restrict blood flow, alter joint mechanics, and irritate sensitive nerves at the base of the skull—frequently resulting in tension-type headaches or contributing to migraines.

Stress also affects breathing patterns. Shallow or upper-chest breathing increases strain through the neck and rib cage, further reinforcing muscular tension. Over time, this creates a cycle in which stress leads to physical restriction, which then perpetuates pain.

Osteopathic treatment aims to address both the mechanical and nervous system components of stress-related headaches. By gently releasing tension in the neck, shoulders, and upper spine, improving rib and diaphragmatic movement, and calming the nervous system, osteopathy can help reduce headache frequency and intensity.

Equally important is recognising stress as a legitimate physical load on the body. Headaches are not “all in the mind”—they are often the body’s way of signalling overload.

How Is Osteopathy Different from Chiropractic?

Osteopathy and chiropractic are often grouped together, but they are distinct disciplines with different philosophies, assessment methods, and treatment approaches.

Osteopathy is a whole-body, systems-based approach to health. Osteopaths are trained to assess how the muscles, joints, nerves, circulation, and internal organs interact. Treatment is guided by the understanding that the body functions as an integrated unit, and that pain in one area may originate elsewhere. An osteopathic session often involves hands-on assessment of posture, movement, breathing, and tissue quality before treatment begins.

Chiropractic care, by contrast, is primarily focused on the spine and nervous system, with an emphasis on spinal alignment and joint adjustment. Chiropractic treatment often centres on specific spinal manipulations aimed at improving nerve function and relieving pain, particularly in the neck and lower back.

While both professions use manual techniques, osteopathy typically employs a wider range of approaches—soft tissue work, joint articulation, gentle mobilisation, cranial techniques, and functional movement assessment. Treatment plans are usually broader and more individualised, particularly for complex or long-standing conditions. 

Neither approach is “better”; they are simply different. Some patients respond well to chiropractic adjustments, others to osteopathic treatment. The key difference lies in scope and philosophy: osteopathy tends to address the whole person and the patterns behind pain, rather than focusing solely on a specific joint or spinal segment.

Why Did the Osteopathic Health Centre Close?

After 25 years of continuous service, the Osteopathic Health Centre closed its doors at the end of 2025. For many patients, this raised understandable questions. The closure was not about a loss of belief in osteopathy, nor a decline in the quality of care. Rather, it marked the natural conclusion of a long chapter and the beginning of a quieter, more focused phase of work.

Healthcare has changed significantly over the last two decades. Rising operational costs, increasing regulatory pressures, and the complexity of running a large multidisciplinary clinic have made independent practice more challenging than ever. After careful reflection, it became clear that continuing to run a full clinical facility no longer aligned with the stage of life and work priorities of its founders.

The decision was made thoughtfully and with respect for patients, staff, and the wider medical community. Closing the clinic allowed its founders to step away from the administrative and financial pressures of clinic ownership, while preserving what mattered most: the integrity of the work, the quality of care, and the long-standing therapeutic relationships built over decades.

Importantly, the closure of the Osteopathic Health Centre does not mean the end of osteopathic care. Many practitioners from the team continue to practise elsewhere, and patients have been supported in transitioning their care. For Malcolm Gregory, it has meant a shift toward part-time clinical work and consultancy—continuing to treat long-term patients without the demands of running a large organisation.

After thousands of patients treated and a legacy of integrative, patient-centred care, the clinic’s closure represents completion rather than loss. It is a reminder that good work can evolve, change form, and still remain deeply meaningful.